Proprietary software – Wikipedia

Software released under a license restricting rights

Proprietary software is software that is deemed within the free and open-source software community to be non-free because its creator, publisher, or other rightsholder or rightsholder partner exercises a legal monopoly by modern copyright and intellectual property law to exclude the recipient from freely sharing the software or modifying it, and—in some cases, as is the case with some patent-encumbered and EULA-bound software—from making use of the software on their own, thereby restricting their freedoms. It is often contrasted with open-source or free software.[1] For this reason, it is also known as non-free software or closed-source software.[1][2][disputed – discuss]

Types

[edit]

Origin[edit]

Until the late 1960s computers—large and expensive mainframe computers, machines in specially air-conditioned computer rooms—were usually leased to customers rather than sold.[3][4] Service and all software available were usually supplied by manufacturers without separate charge until 1969. Computer vendors usually provided the source code for installed software to customers.[citation needed] Customers who developed software often made it available to others without charge.[5] Closed source means computer programs whose source code is not published except to licensees. It is available to be edited only by the organization that developed it and those licensed to use the software.

In 1969, IBM, which had antitrust lawsuits pending against it, led an industry change by starting to charge separately for mainframe software [ 6 ] [ 7 ] and services, by unbundling hardware and software. [ 8 ]Bill Gates ‘ ” Open Letter to Hobbyists ” in 1976 decried computer hobbyists ‘ rampant copyright infringement of software, particularly Microsoft’s Altair BASIC interpreter, and asserted that their unauthorized use hindered his ability to produce quality software. But the legal status of software copyright, especially for object code, was not clear until the 1983 appeals court ruling in Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp. [ 9 ] [ 10 ] [ 11 ]According to Brewster Kahle the legal characteristic of software changed also due to the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976. [ 12 ]Starting in February 1983 IBM adopted an ” object-code – only ” Model for a growing list of their software and stopped shipping much of the source code, [ 13 ] [ 14 ] even to licensees .In 1983, binary software became copyrightable in the United States as well by the Apple vs. Franklin law decision, [ 15 ] before which only source code was copyrightable. [ 16 ] Additionally, the growing availability of millions of computers based on the same microprocessor architecture created for the first time an unfragmented and big enough market for binary distributed software. [ 16 ]

Licenses[edit]

This section is an excerpt from Software license § Proprietary software licensesThe hallmark of proprietary software licenses is that the software publisher grants the use of one or more copies of software under the end-user license agreement ( EULA ), but ownership of those copies remains with the software publisher ( hence use of the term ” proprietary ” ). This feature of proprietary software licenses means that certain rights regarding the software are reserved by the software publisher. Therefore, it is typical of EULAs to include terms which define the uses of the software, such as the number of installations allowed or the terms of distribution .

The most significant effect of this form of licensing is that, if ownership of the software remains with the software publisher, then the end-user must accept the software license. In other words, without acceptance of the license, the end-user may not use the software at all. One example of such a proprietary software license is the license for Microsoft Windows. As is usually the case with proprietary software licenses, this license contains an extensive list of activities which are restricted, such as: reverse engineering, simultaneous use of the software by multiple users, and publication of benchmarks or performance tests.

There are numerous types of licensing models, varying from simple perpetual licenses and floating licenses (also known as concurrent licenses) to more advanced models such as the metered license. The most common licensing models are per single user (named user, client, node) or per user in the appropriate volume discount level, while some manufacturers accumulate existing licenses. These open volume licensing programs are typically called open license program (OLP), transactional license program (TLP), volume license program (VLP) etc. and are contrary to the contractual license program (CLP), where the customer commits to purchase a certain number of licenses over a fixed period (mostly two years). Licensing per concurrent/floating user also occurs, where all users in a network have access to the program, but only a specific number at the same time. Another license model is licensing per dongle, which allows the owner of the dongle to use the program on any computer. Licensing per server, CPU or points, regardless the number of users, is common practice, as well as site or company licenses. Sometimes one can choose between perpetual (permanent) and annual license. For perpetual licenses, one year of maintenance is often required, but maintenance (subscription) renewals are discounted. For annual licenses, there is no renewal; a new license must be purchased after expiration. Licensing can be host/client (or guest), mailbox, IP address, domain etc., depending on how the program is used. Additional users are inter alia licensed per extension pack (e.g. up to 99 users), which includes the base pack (e.g. 5 users). Some programs are modular, so one will have to buy a base product before they can use other modules.[17]

Software licensing often also includes maintenance. This, usually with a term of one year, is either included or optional, but must often be bought with the software. The maintenance agreement ( contract ) typically contains a clause that allows the licensee to receive minor updates ( V. 1.1 => 1.2 ), and sometimes major updates ( V. 1.2 => 2.0 ). This option is usually called update insurance or tăng cấp assurance. For a major update, the customer has to buy an tăng cấp, if it is not included in the maintenance agreement. For a maintenance renewal, some manufacturers charge a reinstatement ( reinstallment ) fee retroactively per month, in the sự kiện that the current maintenance has expired .Maintenance sometimes includes technical tư vấn. When it does, the level of technical tư vấn, which are commonly named gold, silver and bronze, can vary depending on the communication method ( i. e. e-mail versus telephone tư vấn ), availability ( e. g. 5×8, 5 days a week, 8 hours a day ) and reaction time ( e. g. three hours ). Support is also licensed per incident as an incident pack ( e. g. five tư vấn incidents per year ). [ 17 ]
Many manufacturers offer special conditions for schools and government agencies (EDU/GOV license). Migration from another product (crossgrade), even from a different manufacturer (competitive upgrade) is offered.[17]Many manufacturers offer special conditions for schools and government agencies ( EDU / GOV license ). Migration from another product ( crossgrade ), even from a different manufacturer ( competitive tăng cấp ) is offered .

Legal basis[edit]

Most of the software is covered by copyright which, along with contract law, patents, and trade secrets, provides legal basis for its owner to establish exclusive rights. [ 18 ]A software vendor delineates the specific terms of use in an end-user license agreement ( EULA ). The user may agree to this contract in writing, interactively on màn hình hiển thị ( clickwrap ), or by opening the box containing the software ( shrink wrap licensing ). License agreements are usually not negotiable. [ 19 ] Software patents grant exclusive rights to algorithms, software features, or other patentable subject matter, with coverage varying by jurisdiction. Vendors sometimes grant patent rights to the user in the license agreement. [ 20 ] The source code for a piece of proprietary software is routinely handled as a trade secret. [ 21 ] Software can be made available with fewer restrictions on licensing or source-code access ; software that satisfies certain conditions of freedom and openness is known as ” không lấy phí ” or ” open-source. ” [ 22 ]

Limitations[edit]

Since license agreements do not override applicable copyright law or contract law, provisions in conflict with applicable law are not enforceable. [ 23 ] Some software is specifically licensed and not sold, in order to avoid limitations of copyright such as the first-sale doctrine. [ 24 ]

Exclusive rights[edit]

The owner of proprietary software exercises certain exclusive rights over the software. The owner can restrict the use, inspection of source code, modification of source code, and redistribution .

Use of the software[edit]

Vendors typically limit the number of computers on which software can be used, and prohibit the user from installing the software on extra computers.[citation needed] Restricted use is sometimes enforced through a technical measure, such as product activation, a product key or serial number, a hardware key, or copy protection.

Vendors may also distribute versions that remove particular features, or versions which allow only certain fields of endeavor, such as non-commercial, educational, or non-profit use .Use restrictions vary by license :

• Windows Vista Starter is restricted to running a maximum of three concurrent applications.
• The retail edition of Microsoft Office Home and Student 2007 is limited to non-commercial use on up to three devices in one household.
• Windows XP can be installed on one computer, and limits the number of network file sharing connections to 10.[25] The Home Edition disables features present in Windows XP Professional.
• Traditionally, Adobe licenses are limited to one user, but allow the user to install a second copy on a home computer or laptop.[26] This is no longer true with the switching to Creative Cloud.
• iWork ’09, Apple’s productivity suite, is available in a five-user family pack, for use on up to five computers in a household.[27]

Inspection and modification of source code[edit]

Vendors typically distribute proprietary software in compiled form, usually the machine language understood by the computer’s central processing unit. They typically retain the source code, or human-readable version of the software, often written in a higher level programming language. [ 28 ] This scheme is often referred to as closed source. [ 29 ]

While most proprietary software is distributed without the source code, some vendors distribute the source code or otherwise make it available to customers. For example, users who have purchased a license for the Internet forum software vBulletin can modify the source for their own site but cannot redistribute it. This is true for many web applications, which must be in source code form when being run by a web server. The source code is covered by a non-disclosure agreement or a license that allows, for example, study and modification, but not redistribution.[30] The text-based email client Pine and certain implementations of Secure Shell are distributed with proprietary licenses that make the source code available.[citation needed]Some licenses for proprietary software allow distributing changes to the source code, but only to others licensed for the product, and some[31] of those modifications are eventually picked up by the vendor.

Some governments fear that proprietary software may include defects or malicious features which would compromise sensitive information. In 2003 Microsoft established a Government Security Program (GSP) to allow governments to view source code and Microsoft security documentation, of which the Chinese government was an early participant.[32][33] The program is part of Microsoft’s broader Shared Source Initiative which provides source code access for some products. The Reference Source License (Ms-RSL) and Limited Public License (Ms-LPL) are proprietary software licenses where the source code is made available.

Governments have also been accused of adding such malware to software themselves. According to documents released by Edward Snowden, the NSA has used covert partnerships with software companies to make commercial encryption software exploitable to eavesdropping, or to insert backdoors. [ 34 ] [ 35 ]

Software vendors sometimes use obfuscated code to impede users who would reverse engineer the software.[36] This is particularly common with certain programming languages.[citation needed] For example, the bytecode for programs written in Java can be easily decompiled to somewhat usable code,[citation needed] and the source code for programs written in scripting languages such as PHP or JavaScript is available at run time.[37]

Redistribution[edit]

Proprietary software vendors can prohibit the users from sharing the software with others. Another unique license is required for another party to use the software .In the case of proprietary software with source code available, the vendor may also prohibit customers from distributing their modifications to the source code .Shareware is closed-source software whose owner encourages redistribution at no cost, but which the user sometimes must pay to use after a trial period. The fee usually allows use by a single user or computer. In some cases, software features are restricted during or after the trial period, a practice sometimes called crippleware .

Interoperability with software and hardware[edit]

Proprietary file formats and protocols[edit]

Proprietary software often[citation needed] stores some of its data in file formats that are incompatible with other software, and may also communicate using protocols which are incompatible. Such formats and protocols may be restricted as trade secrets or subject to patents.[citation needed]

Proprietary APIs[edit]

A proprietary application programming interface ( API ) is a software library interface ” specific to one device or, more likely to a number of devices within a particular manufacturer’s product range. ” [ 38 ] The motivation for using a proprietary API can be vendor lock-in or because standard APIs do not tư vấn the device’s functionality. [ 38 ]The European Commission, in its March 24, 2004, decision on Microsoft’s business practices, [ 39 ] quotes, in paragraph 463, Microsoft general manager for C + + development Aaron Contorer as stating in a February 21, 1997, internal Microsoft memo drafted for Bill Gates :

The Windows API is so broad, so deep, and so functional that most ISVs would be crazy not to use it. And it is so deeply embedded in the source code of many Windows apps that there is a huge switching cost to using a different operating system instead.

Early versions of the iPhone SDK were covered by a non-disclosure agreement. The agreement forbade independent developers from discussing the content of the interfaces. Apple discontinued the NDA in October 2008. [ 40 ]

Vendor lock-in[edit]

Any dependency on the future versions and upgrades for a proprietary software package can create vendor lock-in, entrenching a monopoly position.[41]

Software limited to certain hardware configurations[edit]

Proprietary software may also have licensing terms that limit the usage of that software to a specific set of hardware. Apple has such a licensing Mã Sản Phẩm for macOS, an operating system which is limited to Apple hardware, both by licensing and various design decisions. This licensing Model has been affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [ 42 ]

Abandonment by proprietors[edit]

Proprietary software which is no longer marketed, supported or sold by its owner is called abandonware, the digital form of orphaned works. If the proprietor of a software package should cease to exist, or decide to cease or limit production or tư vấn for a proprietary software package, recipients and users of the package may have no recourse if problems are found with the software. Proprietors can fail to improve and tư vấn software because of business problems. [ 43 ] Support for older or existing versions of a software package may be ended to force users to tăng cấp and pay for newer versions [ 44 ] ( planned obsolescence ). Sometimes another vendor or a software’s community themselves can provide tư vấn for the software, or the users can migrate to either competing systems with longer tư vấn life cycles or to FOSS – based systems. [ 45 ]

Some proprietary software is released by their owner at end-of-life as open-source or source available software, often to prevent the software from becoming unsupported and unavailable abandonware.[46][47][48] 3D Realms and id Software are famous for the practice of releasing closed source software into the open source.[further explanation needed] Some of those kinds are free-of-charge downloads (freeware), some are still commercially sold (e.g. Arx Fatalis).[further explanation needed] More examples of formerly closed-source software in the List of commercial software with available source code and List of commercial video games with available source code.

Pricing and economics[edit]

Proprietary software is not synonymous with commercial software, [ 49 ] [ 50 ] although the two terms are sometimes used synonymously in articles about không tính tiền software. [ 51 ] [ 52 ] Proprietary software can be distributed at no cost or for a fee, and không tính tiền software can be distributed at no cost or for a fee. [ 53 ] The difference is that whether proprietary software can be distributed, and what the fee would be, is at the proprietor’s discretion. With không lấy phí software, anyone who has a copy can decide whether, and how much, to charge for a copy or related services. [ 54 ]Proprietary software that comes for no cost is called freeware .Proponents of commercial proprietary software argue that requiring users to pay for software as a product increases funding or time available for the research and development of software. For example, Microsoft says that per-copy fees maximize the profitability of software development. [ 55 ]Proprietary software generally creates greater commercial activity over không tính tiền software, especially in regard to market revenues. [ 56 ] Proprietary software is often sold with a license that gives the end user right to use the software .

Examples[edit]

Examples of proprietary software include Microsoft Windows, Adobe Flash Player, PS3 OS, Orbis OS, iTunes, Adobe Photoshop, Google Earth, macOS ( formerly Mac OS X and OS X ), Skype, WinRAR, Oracle’s version of Java, Huawei’s HarmonyOS and some versions of Unix .Software distributions considered as proprietary may in fact incorporate a ” mixed source ” Mã Sản Phẩm including both không lấy phí and non-free software in the same distribution. [ 57 ] Most if not all so-called proprietary UNIX distributions are mixed source software, bundling open-source components like BIND, Sendmail, X Window System, DHCP, and others along with a purely proprietary kernel and system utilities. [ 58 ] [ 59 ]Some không lấy phí software packages are also simultaneously available under proprietary terms. Examples include MySQL, Sendmail and ssh. The original copyright holders for a work of không lấy phí software, even copyleft không tính tiền software, can use dual-licensing to allow themselves or others to redistribute proprietary versions. Non-copyleft không lấy phí software ( i. e. software distributed under a permissive không tính tiền software license or released to the public domain ) allows anyone to make proprietary redistributions. [ 60 ] [ 61 ] Free software that depends on proprietary software is considered ” trapped ” by the Free Software Foundation. This includes software written only for Microsoft Windows, [ 62 ] or software that could only run on Java, before it became không lấy phí software. [ 63 ]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

• Media related to Proprietary software at Wikimedia Commons

Source: https://dichvubachkhoa.vn
Category : Sửa Tivi